From gabor at szabgab.com Tue Apr 2 16:29:00 2013 From: gabor at szabgab.com (Gabor Szabo) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:29:00 +0300 Subject: Downloading public details of users as a guest Message-ID: Hi, if I have certain rights I can download a csv file with all the details of the registered users. Is there a way to download all the *public* details of all the users in some compact format (e.g. csv, or json?) for someone who is not even logged in to Act? I mean all the details that one could access in any case using the browser. Gabor From raiph.mellor at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 16:48:55 2013 From: raiph.mellor at gmail.com (raiph mellor) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:48:55 -0400 Subject: Downloading public details of users as a guest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: According to this doc you can get json if you have an API key: http://act.mongueurs.net/doc/Manual/Organizer/WebAPI.html Hth, -- raiph On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: > Hi, > > if I have certain rights I can download a csv file with all the > details of the registered users. > > Is there a way to download all the *public* details of all the users > in some compact format (e.g. csv, or json?) for someone who is not > even logged in to Act? > I mean all the details that one could access in any case using the browser. > > Gabor > _______________________________________________ > Act mailing list > Act at mongueurs.net > http://listes.mongueurs.net/mailman/listinfo/act -- raiph From gabor at szabgab.com Tue Apr 2 19:45:34 2013 From: gabor at szabgab.com (Gabor Szabo) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:45:34 +0300 Subject: Downloading public details of users as a guest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: That's Interesting. On one hand that API requires the cooperation of the organizers to add the API key to act.ini, on the other hand I could just fetch the act.ini of YAPC::EU so maybe anyone can actually see and use the key. Well, unless that key is the public pair of a private key. I was actually looking for something like the timetable.ics that anyone can download. I tried to configure the API key for the ILPW2013 but it seems my svn commits are not deployed to the live site. Is something broken on the act server or am I doing something wrong? Gabor On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:48 PM, raiph mellor wrote: > According to this doc you can get json if you have an API key: > http://act.mongueurs.net/doc/Manual/Organizer/WebAPI.html > > Hth, > > -- > raiph > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> if I have certain rights I can download a csv file with all the >> details of the registered users. >> >> Is there a way to download all the *public* details of all the users >> in some compact format (e.g. csv, or json?) for someone who is not >> even logged in to Act? >> I mean all the details that one could access in any case using the browser. >> >> Gabor >> _______________________________________________ >> Act mailing list >> Act at mongueurs.net >> http://listes.mongueurs.net/mailman/listinfo/act > > > > -- > raiph From sebastien at aperghis.net Tue Apr 2 22:21:33 2013 From: sebastien at aperghis.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Aperghis-Tramoni?=) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 22:21:33 +0200 Subject: Are there still several Act installations? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3F8DACA2-E822-452B-A595-4ABD83184D1D@aperghis.net> Gabor Szabo a ?crit : > There used to be several Act installations. > One for YAPC::NA::2012 one for YAPC::Russia. > If I am not mistaken a 3rd one for YAPC::Brazil > and then the main one for most of Europe and USA. Eeyup. The currently active Act instances are: - Mongueurs' one, which hosts most of European, American and some Asian conferences - Perl Russia's one, operated by Andrew, which hosts most of the conferences he organized in Russia and Europe - YAPC::Brasil - YAPC::NA 2012 (the previous ones, and this year's are hosted at the Mongueurs) > If they are still separate. Is there a plan in place to unite them? Nuba Princigalli just asked on #act if it could be possible to merge YAPC::Brasil 2009-2012 into Mongueurs' instance. > Could someone propose this as a project for TPF grant? Maybe, but a more useful grant would be to develop the next generation Act, using BooK's plan for example. This would ease administration and would permit the deployment of more Act instances, while keeping them synced, so they can be close to the users. YAPC::Asia (Tokyo) no longer uses Act because of the latencies between Japan and Europe. Daisuke Maki said they would like to use Act again, but the network latency is a major blocking factor. -- S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni Close the world, txEn eht nepO. From sebastien at aperghis.net Tue Apr 2 22:26:38 2013 From: sebastien at aperghis.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Aperghis-Tramoni?=) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 22:26:38 +0200 Subject: Downloading public details of users as a guest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7730BABB-37EC-4880-81B1-0137B292B51E@aperghis.net> Gabor Szabo wrote: > That's Interesting. > > On one hand that API requires the cooperation of the organizers to add > the API key to act.ini, > on the other hand I could just fetch the act.ini of YAPC::EU so maybe > anyone can actually see > and use the key. Well, unless that key is the public pair of a private key. > I was actually looking for something like the timetable.ics that > anyone can download. It's a simple shared secret; the handler just checks if the key exists in the config: ? https://github.com/book/Act/blob/master/lib/Act/Handler/WebAPI.pm#L45 And yes, you can define it in you local act.ini > I tried to configure the API key for the ILPW2013 but it seems my svn > commits are not deployed > to the live site. Is something broken on the act server or am I doing > something wrong? No, that's normal behavior: closed conference only get svn-updated once per day, at midnight. -- S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni Close the world, txEn eht nepO. From toddr at cpanel.net Tue Apr 2 22:41:48 2013 From: toddr at cpanel.net (Todd Rinaldo) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:41:48 -0500 Subject: Are there still several Act installations? In-Reply-To: <3F8DACA2-E822-452B-A595-4ABD83184D1D@aperghis.net> References: <3F8DACA2-E822-452B-A595-4ABD83184D1D@aperghis.net> Message-ID: On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:21 PM, S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote: > Gabor Szabo a ?crit : > >> Could someone propose this as a project for TPF grant? > > > Maybe, but a more useful grant would be to develop the next generation Act, using BooK's plan for example. This would ease administration and would permit the deployment of more Act instances, while keeping them synced, so they can be close to the users. > > YAPC::Asia (Tokyo) no longer uses Act because of the latencies between Japan and Europe. Daisuke Maki said they would like to use Act again, but the network latency is a major blocking factor. You know, today is the 4th time since January that I've perused https://github.com/book/Act and thought: "It would be relatively easy make this code Catalyst based..." *Todd Ducks* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gabor at szabgab.com Wed Apr 3 07:47:59 2013 From: gabor at szabgab.com (Gabor Szabo) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:47:59 +0300 Subject: Are there still several Act installations? In-Reply-To: <3F8DACA2-E822-452B-A595-4ABD83184D1D@aperghis.net> References: <3F8DACA2-E822-452B-A595-4ABD83184D1D@aperghis.net> Message-ID: On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:21 PM, S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote: > Gabor Szabo a ?crit : > >> There used to be several Act installations. >> One for YAPC::NA::2012 one for YAPC::Russia. >> If I am not mistaken a 3rd one for YAPC::Brazil >> and then the main one for most of Europe and USA. > > Eeyup. The currently active Act instances are: > - Mongueurs' one, which hosts most of European, American and some Asian conferences > - Perl Russia's one, operated by Andrew, which hosts most of the conferences he organized in Russia and Europe > - YAPC::Brasil > - YAPC::NA 2012 (the previous ones, and this year's are hosted at the Mongueurs) > >> If they are still separate. Is there a plan in place to unite them? > > Nuba Princigalli just asked on #act if it could be possible to merge YAPC::Brasil 2009-2012 into Mongueurs' instance. > >> Could someone propose this as a project for TPF grant? > > > Maybe, but a more useful grant would be to develop the next generation Act, using BooK's plan for example. This would ease administration and would permit the deployment of more Act instances, while keeping them synced, so they can be close to the users. > > YAPC::Asia (Tokyo) no longer uses Act because of the latencies between Japan and Europe. Daisuke Maki said they would like to use Act again, but the network latency is a major blocking factor. > After I asked here I also posted a comment on http://news.perlfoundation.org/2013/03/2013q2-call-for-grant-proposal.html regarding Act and regarding project proposals. Is BooK's plan available somewhere? Could you post a link to it on the call for grants so people could consider doing it or at least part of it? Gabor From philippe.bruhat at free.fr Wed Apr 3 10:27:14 2013 From: philippe.bruhat at free.fr (Philippe Bruhat (BooK)) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:27:14 +0200 Subject: Are there still several Act installations? In-Reply-To: References: <3F8DACA2-E822-452B-A595-4ABD83184D1D@aperghis.net> Message-ID: <20130403082714.GC20414@zlott> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:47:59AM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote: > > > >> Could someone propose this as a project for TPF grant? > > > > Maybe, but a more useful grant would be to develop the next generation > > Act, using BooK's plan for example. This would ease administration and > > would permit the deployment of more Act instances, while keeping them > > synced, so they can be close to the users. > > > > YAPC::Asia (Tokyo) no longer uses Act because of the latencies between > > Japan and Europe. Daisuke Maki said they would like to use Act again, > > but the network latency is a major blocking factor. > > > > After I asked here I also posted a comment on > http://news.perlfoundation.org/2013/03/2013q2-call-for-grant-proposal.html > regarding Act and regarding project proposals. Is BooK's plan > available somewhere? Could you post a link to it on the > call for grants so people could consider doing it or at least part of it? > Torsten sent a grant request by email for working on YACT yesterday. I don't want my vague ideas for a better Act to interfere with his grant. He wants Act to evolve into something better, while I have a full rewrite in mind (with an import step at a later stage). I'll try to write my ideas down and discuss with Torsten during the Perl QA Hackathon, though. I found the script I used to import sofia2009 data into the main Act instance, and it's a relatively easy thing to do. (I also imported ye2003 data into the main instance, Once I have a dump of the data, the only thing needed is to find users that exists in both databases and map one id to the other. The rest is handled by the script. -- Philippe Bruhat (BooK) Ignorance weaves a web from which none can escape. (Moral from Groo The Wanderer #52 (Epic)) From gabor at szabgab.com Thu Apr 4 01:58:42 2013 From: gabor at szabgab.com (Gabor Szabo) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 02:58:42 +0300 Subject: Downloading public details of users as a guest In-Reply-To: <7730BABB-37EC-4880-81B1-0137B292B51E@aperghis.net> References: <7730BABB-37EC-4880-81B1-0137B292B51E@aperghis.net> Message-ID: On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:26 PM, S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote: > It's a simple shared secret; the handler just checks if the key exists in the config: > ? https://github.com/book/Act/blob/master/lib/Act/Handler/WebAPI.pm#L45 > > And yes, you can define it in you local act.ini > >> I tried to configure the API key for the ILPW2013 but it seems my svn >> commits are not deployed >> to the live site. Is something broken on the act server or am I doing >> something wrong? > > > No, that's normal behavior: closed conference only get svn-updated once per day, at midnight. > OK, so after waiting the right amount of time I see the site got updated and I can use the API_key with the ILPW2013 site. If I understand this correctly I still need to ask each conference organizer to add an API_key, right? If they put a key in then anyone can get any of the fields listed in https://github.com/book/Act/blob/master/lib/Act/Handler/WebAPI.pm#L12 including fields that are otherwise not public such as 'email', 'address', 'vat' and maybe a few others. (I am happy to see that passwd is not among them.) If that's true, can Act administrators still allow this without giving out private information? Gabor From andy at shitov.ru Sun Apr 7 22:28:09 2013 From: andy at shitov.ru (Andrew Shitov) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 22:28:09 +0200 Subject: Are there still several Act installations? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Let me add my wish to the new Act. * Mailing lists. In the minimal form it is a single list to send mails to all registered people. In the maximum: a few separate lists like speakers, lightning talk speakers, those who paid/not paid etc. On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote: > There used to be several Act installations. > One for YAPC::NA::2012 one for YAPC::Russia. > If I am not mistaken a 3rd one for YAPC::Brazil > and then the main one for most of Europe and USA. > > If they are still separate. Is there a plan in place to unite them? > Could someone propose this as a project for TPF grant? > > Gabor > > > _______________________________________________ > Act mailing list > Act at mongueurs.net > http://listes.mongueurs.net/mailman/listinfo/act > > -- Andrew Shitov ______________________________________________________________________ andy at shitov.ru | http://shitov.ru -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e... URL: From torsten at raudss.us Mon Apr 8 00:14:50 2013 From: torsten at raudss.us (Torsten Raudssus) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 00:14:50 +0200 Subject: Are there still several Act installations? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Good point, didn't considered this yet cause this topic is mostly more a infrastructure thing, but we could plan this in to combine that with a local mailinglisten management software. I will NOT redo something like that in perl ;) hehe On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Shitov wrote: > Let me add my wish to the new Act. > > * Mailing lists. In the minimal form it is a single list to send mails to > all registered people. In the maximum: a few separate lists like speakers, > lightning talk speakers, those who paid/not paid etc. > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote: > >> There used to be several Act installations. >> One for YAPC::NA::2012 one for YAPC::Russia. >> If I am not mistaken a 3rd one for YAPC::Brazil >> and then the main one for most of Europe and USA. >> >> If they are still separate. Is there a plan in place to unite them? >> Could someone propose this as a project for TPF grant? >> >> Gabor >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Act mailing list >> Act at mongueurs.net >> http://listes.mongueurs.net/mailman/listinfo/act >> >> > > > -- > Andrew Shitov > ______________________________________________________________________ > andy at shitov.ru | http://shitov.ru > > _______________________________________________ > Act mailing list > Act at mongueurs.net > http://listes.mongueurs.net/mailman/listinfo/act > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sebastien at aperghis.net Mon Apr 8 00:34:59 2013 From: sebastien at aperghis.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Aperghis-Tramoni?=) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 00:34:59 +0200 Subject: Downloading public details of users as a guest In-Reply-To: References: <7730BABB-37EC-4880-81B1-0137B292B51E@aperghis.net> Message-ID: Gabor Szabo wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:26 PM, S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni > wrote: > >> It's a simple shared secret; the handler just checks if the key exists in the config: >> ? https://github.com/book/Act/blob/master/lib/Act/Handler/WebAPI.pm#L45 >> >> And yes, you can define it in you local act.ini >> >>> I tried to configure the API key for the ILPW2013 but it seems my svn >>> commits are not deployed >>> to the live site. Is something broken on the act server or am I doing >>> something wrong? >> >> >> No, that's normal behavior: closed conference only get svn-updated once per day, at midnight. > > OK, so after waiting the right amount of time I see the site got > updated and I can use the API_key with the ILPW2013 site. Next time, don't hesitate to ping me on IRC so I svn update the repository. > If I understand this correctly I still need to ask each conference > organizer to add an API_key, right? No, a user can be adde in the global Act configuration, and thus access the information from all conferences. Barbie has such an access for the YAPC Surveys. > If they put a key in then anyone can get any of the fields listed in > https://github.com/book/Act/blob/master/lib/Act/Handler/WebAPI.pm#L12 > including fields that are otherwise not public such as 'email', > 'address', 'vat' and maybe a few others. (I am happy to see that > passwd is not among them.) > > If that's true, can Act administrators still allow this without giving > out private information? Most of these information are hidden unless you have the appropriate right. Except probably the name if the pseudonymous flag is enabled. Act::Handler::WebAPI clearly needs to be modified in order to correctly honor the rights. -- S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni Close the world, txEn eht nepO. From sebastien at aperghis.net Mon Apr 8 00:35:54 2013 From: sebastien at aperghis.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Aperghis-Tramoni?=) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 00:35:54 +0200 Subject: Are there still several Act installations? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9CE8DEF6-072B-4ECC-B30B-E5EBCE5BE9E6@aperghis.net> Andrew Shitov wrote: > Let me add my wish to the new Act. > > * Mailing lists. In the minimal form it is a single list to send mails to all registered people. In the maximum: a few separate lists like speakers, lightning talk speakers, those who paid/not paid etc. Agreed. I think there's already a request on Git Hub for that. -- S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni Close the world, txEn eht nepO. From dan at dwright.org Fri Apr 19 05:22:45 2013 From: dan at dwright.org (Daniel Wright) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:22:45 -0400 Subject: Adding a person to an event. Message-ID: <9F288D38-4C0D-49DF-A1C0-6FCDBBDC9484@dwright.org> I need to add Larry (user 273) to yn2013 without making him go through the steps himself. Can somebody give me instructions on how to do that, or if it needs to be an ACT admin, could somebody please do that for me? Thanks, -Dan From sebastien at aperghis.net Sat Apr 20 15:20:29 2013 From: sebastien at aperghis.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Aperghis-Tramoni?=) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:20:29 +0200 Subject: Adding a person to an event. In-Reply-To: <9F288D38-4C0D-49DF-A1C0-6FCDBBDC9484@dwright.org> References: <9F288D38-4C0D-49DF-A1C0-6FCDBBDC9484@dwright.org> Message-ID: <9341B2D4-DF4E-409E-9E5E-043CB2846F94@aperghis.net> Daniel Wright wrote: > I need to add Larry (user 273) to yn2013 without making him go through the steps himself. Can somebody give me instructions on how to do that, or if it needs to be an ACT admin, could somebody please do that for me? (was done yesterday, as well for Gloria) -- S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni Close the world, txEn eht nepO. From andy at shitov.ru Mon Apr 22 15:17:25 2013 From: andy at shitov.ru (Andrew Shitov) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:17:25 +0400 Subject: Adding a person to an event. In-Reply-To: <9341B2D4-DF4E-409E-9E5E-043CB2846F94@aperghis.net> References: <9F288D38-4C0D-49DF-A1C0-6FCDBBDC9484@dwright.org> <9341B2D4-DF4E-409E-9E5E-043CB2846F94@aperghis.net> Message-ID: Hi, Maybe then we also should add Larry and Gloria to ye2013. Can you please do that, as well as retrospectively to the ye2011. Thank you. On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:20 PM, S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni < sebastien at aperghis.net> wrote: > Daniel Wright wrote: > > > I need to add Larry (user 273) to yn2013 without making him go through > the steps himself. Can somebody give me instructions on how to do that, > or if it needs to be an ACT admin, could somebody please do that for me? > > > (was done yesterday, as well for Gloria) > > > -- > S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni > > Close the world, txEn eht nepO. > > _______________________________________________ > Act mailing list > Act at mongueurs.net > http://listes.mongueurs.net/mailman/listinfo/act > -- Andrew Shitov ______________________________________________________________________ andy at shitov.ru | http://shitov.ru -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e... URL: From sebastien at aperghis.net Mon Apr 22 15:23:41 2013 From: sebastien at aperghis.net (=?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Aperghis-Tramoni) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Adding a person to an event. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <177826857.77985706.1366637021968.JavaMail.root@spooler3-g27.priv.proxad.net> Andrew Shitov wrote: > Hi, Hello Andrew, > Maybe then we also should add Larry and Gloria to ye2013. Can you > please do that, as well as retrospectively to the ye2011. Done. -- S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni Close the world, txEn eht nepO. From sebastien at aperghis.net Tue Apr 23 23:55:01 2013 From: sebastien at aperghis.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Aperghis-Tramoni?=) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:55:01 +0200 Subject: gpw2014 Message-ID: Hello burnersk, As requested on IRC, I configured the test site for gpw2014, copied from this year's conference. It is available online: ? http://test.mongueurs.net/gpw2014/ You can access the files by logging on burnersk at test.mongueurs.net, in ~/gpw2014-test/ You can use the test site to privately hack on it. It runs on a separate instance of Act, so you'll have to create a new account there. Once you are satisfied with the site, we put it in production within its final domain. If you never worked with Act before, you'll want to read the documentation for organizers, especially the Configuration, Layout and Templates sections: ? http://act.mongueurs.net/doc/Manual/Organizer.html Mostly, you need to modify the template parts, based on Template Toolkit 2. Most of the settings of the conferences are in the actdocs/conf/act.ini configuration file. I already put sensible values here, but feel free to modify the dates and the address for receiving the talks proposals. -- S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni Close the world, txEn eht nepO. From smash at cpan.org Sat Apr 27 18:06:33 2013 From: smash at cpan.org (Nuno Carvalho) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:06:33 +0100 Subject: Act instance Portuguese Perl Workshop (PtPW) 2013 Edition Message-ID: Hello everyone, Could you please set up an Act instance for the 2013 Portuguese Perl Workshop edition. I'll be taking care of the site again so you should have my user already created (smash) with the correct SSH key.Could you also please copy last year's site so we don't have to start from scratch? Let me know if you need anything else from me. Thank you for an excellent work, Best regards, smash