[Act] YAPCEU::2015
Diego Kuperman
diego at freekeylabs.com
Mon Dec 8 23:35:05 CET 2014
On Dec 7, 2014, at 10:28 PM, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
> Diego Kuperman wrote:
>
>> On Dec 3, 2014, at 1:28 AM, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
>>
>>> Diego Kuperman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good morning Sébastien,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to add JJ to the svn repo of 'ye2015', his public key
>>>> is: …by the way… I've seen you are working on a new workflow using
>>>> github!… I would really like to be a beta tester, my user is
>>>> diegok,
>>>> JJ is JJ also there :-)
>>>
>>> I converted the SVN repository to Git, on Git Hub:
>>> » https://github.com/Act-Conferences/ye2015
>>>
>>> I sent you and JJ an invitation to join the group and thus be able
>>> to
>>> commit to this repository.
>>>
>> Thank you!. I've been reading other thread you had a proposal for git
>> workflow. It looks fantastic to me… is that proposal already
>> working?, should I push a new brand 'test' to get the site deployed
>> on the testing instance?. If i create a brand prod it will go to
>> production?.
>
> Actually, no, I didn't do that and use master for both. But I don't think
> a production site is using Git yet. It's a bit more cumbersome because it
> requires (obviously) to double the number of repository checkouts.
> If people ask for, we can go to such a workflow though.
>
Ok, I've already seen that all my pushes to master where deployed to the test site. That's fine to me as I'm using Alexm vagrant box for local development and testing :-)
So… now we can move the site to production and ensure master is always deployed to production!… looks like we have a "production site" already on git ;-)
If at some point this branch-workflow is stetted up to work just tell me and I'll be more than happy to testing it.
Kindly regards,
-dk
More information about the Act
mailing list